Experimental Medicine - Vaccines
Science & Reason: Experimental Medicine - Vaccines
In 2012, a 16 year old girl in Australia was diagnosed with “premature ovarian failure” (early onset menopause) following a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Further testing confirmed that “all of her eggs were dead,” leaving her “totally and irrevocably infertile.” Approximately 2,000 similar cases were reported in Japan before the government of Japan publicly withdrew support of the HPV vaccine
(BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-006879).
The United Nations International Emergency Children’s Fund (UNICEF), is the largest buyer of immunisations in the world. UNICEF immunises over 40% of the world’s children. According to UNICEF 1.5 million children die every year due to lack of vaccines. To date, the World Health Organization (WHO), a United Nations specialised agency, has more than 30 formulae for vaccine-preventable diseases, over 120 vaccine products, and another 80 candidate vaccines in late stages of development. According to the WHO, their goal is to, “build a better, healthier future for people all over the world. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of health for all people. “
In 2014, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association charged the WHO and UNICEF with the undertaking of mass sterilisation of millions of women and girls (ages 14-49) in the name of the tetanus vaccination. Tetanus is one disease UNICEF has identified as highly threatening and also highly preventable. As a result, they provide a vaccine to women of childbearing age, and since 1999 UNICEF has immunised more than a 118 million women in 50 countries. This was a vaccine program that did not involve men or boys at all, even though anyone is susceptible to tetanus. Six samples of the vaccine were tested in labs outside of Kenya and all six proved to be laced with the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) antigen.
The hCG antigen “mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women and causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of hCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage” or spontaneous abortion.
How is it that an anti-fertility agent can accidentally enter a tetanus vaccination? WHO failed to respond to enquiries. According to the lead doctor of Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association, “The hormone, Beta hCG, is neither a byproduct of, nor a component required for, the manufacture of the tetanus vaccine. It being part of the vaccine is nothing short of a scheme to forcefully render our women incapable of bearing children.” “...[V]accinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for hCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.”
Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a yearly basis toward manufacturing and distributing various vaccines around the world, with over a hundred million dollars coming from European countries like Sweden, Norway, Great Britain, and Denmark. When funds are depleted from the UN budget to buy vaccines, contributions from other nations and foundations come into play. Tens of millions of dollars have also come from the United Nations Population Fund, the World Bank, The Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This allows the vaccines to be administered for free, or at a very low price, and on top of that governments are usually offered financial incentives to participate in these programs. This would explain why in 2014 the Kenyan government was refusing to let anyone get samples of the vaccines to be tested for hCG. Doctors wanted to conduct tests for hCG in conjunction with the government but could not get cooperation for this.
The notion that the WHO has an agenda to sterilise women in certain parts of the world may be unimaginable to some people, but it cannot be denied because they have been caught doing it several times over the past fifty years. Tetanus vaccines that caused infertility were provided by the UN and the WHO, and were distributed to the Philippines, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Tanzania. In the Philippines, the WHO and the Department of Health initially denied the allegations, but when hCG tested positive in vaccine samples, they amended their story to admit “insignificant” quantities were found in the vaccines. Subsequent testing of pregnant women revealed that of the 30 tested after receiving the tetanus vaccine in the Philippines, 26 tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG. They would all miscarry their pregnancies.
How is it that these women were found with high levels of anti-hCG if there was no hCG in the tetanus vaccines or insignificant quantities in the vaccines? To further reveal the clandestine activity amongst the different gangsters involved, they violated the law as none of the tetanus vaccines used in the Philippines were ever licensed for sale and distribution nor registered with the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drugs.
If there is any doubt about the use of hCG as an anti-fertility agent in “developing” nations, we can also take a look at the patent for it developed by researchers in the Department of Health, the Department of Immunology and at the University of Washington’s Biology department. The patent is titled Recombinant birth control vaccine- US 5733553 A. The description following the patent is as follows,
Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility. We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries.
The tetanus vaccination is just one among many that has been used as a carrier to forcefully sterilise girls and women in “developing” or economically disadvantaged countries. Other vaccines include human papillomavirus (HPV), diphtheria, cholera and others.
Why is it that these vaccines are being forcefully and mandatorily administered among select populations around the globe?
Population growth control is the main claim - diminishing the birth rate. However, many question that this is the full story, pointing specifically to efforts to reduce the population in the economically disadvantaged countries where there are vast natural resources... populations who just so happen to fall victim to pandemics in need of WHO and UNICEF aid.
Other claims, considering these facts, point to the science of negative eugenics. Eugenics being defined as,
The study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).
In other words, the science and means of developing a master race by eradicating bloodlines where the “inheritable undesirable traits” are associated with dark skinned people around the globe and have therefore been the targeted populations in the pursuit of forced mass sterilisation.
This is not new in Western history. Funded by The Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegies, prestigious academic institutions, etc., eugenics has been practised in the United States since the early 1900s, enacting forced sterilisation, segregation laws, and marriage restrictions against people of economically and socially poor backgrounds, especially among the black community. In the 1930s, again The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz, the site of one Nazi concentration camp during WWII.
If we see the same sponsors for the mass sterilisation programs of the 20th century as we do for these vaccines that have inadvertently sterilised countless dark-skinned and financially under-privileged women today, is it probable that the agenda is the exact same, perhaps in a different package and more covert than a century ago?
