The Hidden Dimensions Part 2
Philosophy Podium: The Hidden Dimensions Part 2
The notion of the egg is a world inside which entities evolve, all of them strongly linked by the destiny of the whole as a result of the individual becomings in a determined space and time. This notion is called zouhet by the schools of Thebes. If the great world or the universe exists, it cannot survive as a homogenous space or time; this means that our idea of an existence inside which every entity plays a decisive role in the becoming of the universe is simply a direction we have given to our imagination. If it can be very cold in one part of the Earth and at the same time very hot in another part, we can see that somewhere between the two there is a sort of frontier. It is the notion of the zouhet that maintains a sort of distance in space and time in things and events. The heat, cold, liquid, gas, etc, all appear to be contained in a determined space and we can say the same thing for events in relation to a determined fork of time.
The zouhet (the egg of the world) is what protects the universe from the energetic collapse by limiting or let's say by making evolution of every becoming a phenomenon that happens in a world first, then going from one world to another. The fact that every world brings its particularities becomes a limiting factor to the consequences. If we imagine the difference between an egg regardless of its size, solidity to the multitude of eggs regardless of their fragility, we will see that the multitude of eggs gives more chance to the survival of a portion. Without the notion of a zouhet, the existence will break down at every incident like a castle made of playing cards. We have said in the preceding issue that the space has offered to us a domain that is solid enough to witness the arrival of dimensions like length, height and width. The step above these become completely submitted to our method of investigation. We have said that despite refusing to expose itself voluntarily to our consciousness, existence never refuses its responsibility of answering our questions. If our questions reveal our domains of interest, what interests us also reveals our level of intelligence or let's say the dimension of the world in which we think we are...our zouhet. And since every zouhet is a world made of entities, actions, reactions and consequences, every individual has a tendency of believing that their zouhet is not just their world, but also "the" world or even the universe. This is why we don't know what we have not been exposed to, and for us what we are not exposed to does not exist.
The biggest problem to a human consciousness is generally the one we have difficulties to perceive. It will be good for our brain to know, with certainty, if what we do not observe exists. If what I do not observe exists, how then will that thing be linked to me? In other words, won't that be easier to affirm with certainty that the flower I'm observing stops existing every time I close my eyes? The truth is when I close my eyes, it is my memory that maintains the flower where I placed it. What, then, is the existential value of that flower I maintain in my memory?
We can even push that conflict a lot further: we know that everything we can see appears to have an image that we can harvest and place in our memory... but the vision is only one of our senses. What, then, does what we hear offer to our memory? What does our sense of touch provide to that memory... etc.
Let's come back to the image: what do we then see in the minor every time we place ourselves in front of it? At the first look, we always think it's our image, but is it really our image? Why, then, does this image always lift the right hand when we move the left? And if I drink a glass of milk in front of a mirror, what is my image drinking? The image of milk? Is my image then drinking the image of milk?
If this logic is acceptable, is there any other thing that my image is doing to other images that I'm not aware of? We love to define ourselves as beings capable of adventure and. especially, "independence". Should we then allocate these same qualities to our images? The existence defies the intelligence of the one that is looking for the one in search of the secrets of what 1S.
The notion of the zouhet is very old. The philosophy of the schools working toward the enlightenment of our conscious taught us that our will to situate ourselves in space and time starts by the exploration of the eggs of existence (zouhets) and relationships among them.
If we believe that we've found in these arguments enough reasons to exercise an opening of the mind, we can then go further. All these notions go from the physical world and already on this level we can see that the only logic that is acceptable in our quest is that there must be zouhets that we do not know about. These zouhets represent parallel worlds with their own becomings loosely linked to each other in the way that the destruction of one or some does not necessarily lead to the destruction of the whole, and allowing the reconfiguration of the relations after every change. This situation leads to the formation of a new existential order made of diverse zouhets. The becoming of the world advances like a long rosary that the existence pushes through bead after bead; the effects or even the evolution of that becoming simply goes from one bead to
There is not only one world that evolves parallel to ours. If we take a risk to separate the evolution of space with the evolution of time with a goal of easing our perceptions of their becomings we can see that the material world, by itself, produces parallel worlds. We can then say in this case with certainty that the dimensional space by itself is a zouhet, a world inside which things become.
For a long time we thought that our consciousness observes an entity only if that entity represents the three- dimensional world that advances in a given fork of time. In that case, what is the evolutionary path taken by an image?
The image in the mirror clearly does not possess a three dimensional reality, but yet it gives that impression to our consciousness. We can take a risk of saying that the world in the mirror is a zouhet. The image reflected on a surface is only made of the images of dimensions. We can affirm that there is a link among the zouhets. We know that the movement of the destruction or perfection of harmony happens first inside a zouhet and then from one zouhet to another. The image of a zouhet is only made of our perception outside of it. It is difficult to say if an image can force our consciousness into accepting chat. But a three dimensional entity does not give us a chance to see its internal image and the impact of it on the becoming. A three dimensional entity is what it is because it refuses to expose its depth to the observer. Our investigation shows that a three dimensional entity only sacrifices the images of what it can be. The three dimensional entity is already, on its level, a zouhet, an existential egg inside which all the elements obey given principles and are subject to the becoming that they are all building together.
