Civilizational Conspiracies: Leadership Towards Submission
Philosophy Podium: Civilizational Conspiracies: Leadership Towards Submission
By observing the history of humanity, one can see that the principles that have determined the development and the fall of people strongly resemble each other to the point that they form a sort of monotonous chain of events. One can even summarize this principle into a sort of conflict of forces between groups in the present. People rise, organize themselves, and become so powerful that within the mass movements, conquest and the domination of others become the only challenge that is interesting enough to carry the mark of national pride. These people then invade and submit others to their laws, beliefs, gods, etc., until the day their victims wake up and organize themselves to reconquer their freedom. And so on and so on. And humanity will spend generations of people in that principle, which in reality is nothing but a power game that is fascinating enough to represent by itself what we can consider a reason to exist.
The principle of conflict of power as we have said in the Kemetic school is the biggest distraction on the path of human evolution. The Earth Center teaches students the irony in the fact that mortals, while advancing directly towards death, try to prove to each other who is the most powerful, intelligent, etc. This logic exists only as logic if it has been designed to distract us because we do not want to see death arrive and reduce to nothing the most powerful of us and become his victim.
The principle of conflict of power between the individual or groups is by itself historically a monotonous repetition of absurd logics charged with the emotions of groups and individuals in a quest for reason to exist. It is the details and the methods used by the invaders to maintain themselves as long as possible in the domineering position that we find interesting whether through their ingenuity or sometimes by the ease with which one can turn the most intelligent people into barbaric beings incapable of simple thoughts and logic.
Every time a group of people is being invaded, the colonizer in reality introduces a social revolution in a society of the colonized. That revolution has the goal to bring deep changes in all the structures of the invaded society. We must keep in mind that in every society it is philosophically very important that the idea of the individual can be preserved as a possibility he can reach. Every time a society does not succeed in convincing the individual that his personal ideal can be reached, it transforms him into a desperate being who will simply disassociate himself and go look for another group that could sell hope to him. The relationship between the individual and his society is by essence dialectic, but in this situation, the society always possesses the advantage of preceding the individual and educating him. The work then of the colonizer becomes the one of convincing the individual of the vanquished society about the desperation and hopelessness of his situation. When that objective is reached, the individual then becomes a production force at the surface of the invader or colonizer. On the level of the politician, it is a sort of grafting of the invader on the human and material resources of the vanquished people.
One can remember the famous method of expansion used by the Mongolian empires, Ottoman Empire, etc. where even the armies of the vanquished people became the ones that the invaders sent to war against other people. The vanquished army was supposed to prove its loyalty to the new master by accepting to submit other people to him!
By applying that method of expansion, diverse invaders have conquered diverse societies without having to pour their own blood.
We must recognize that these methods of expansion by turning the driving forces of a society against itself and its neighbors is a refined principle of dictate as practiced by Roman kingships.
The dictate is generally perceived as a submission of a foreign empire that will dictate its laws and impose taxes on the invaded society without necessarily trying to operate any deep changes in the structures of the society that has been conquered. It leaves then a chance for the conquered society to quickly reorganize itself and fight and re-conquer its autonomy.
The modern aspect of the submission of people is the refinement of the oldest method of invasion by adding changes through the channel of social revolution. Every invader knows that within every social structure, there is a notion of class, and in every society, the class that feels disadvantaged will not really hate a social revolution if that revolution gives to him at least a chance to rise through the ranks of the society. The individual then is so focused on improving his social condition that he does not see that he just sacrificed the same society inside which he thought he was evolving and put himself at the service of the colonial force.
Since the beginning of the first millennium, it has become more and more clear for every ideology that the most important war to win is the war for the hearts and the minds of humanity. As long as one controls the thoughts and values of people, one will control these people while reducing the chances of them waking up and fighting for their liberation. The most flagrant example that we can see in the recent history of humanity is that of the 16th century. Europeans felt compelled to build ships to sail through the seas in a quest for spices, gold, diamonds, wood, etc. because they lacked it so badly. And at every part of this planet they arrived in, they felt compelled to kill, rob, rape, and exploit the riches. A few centuries later, the same Europeans no longer needed to invade people for their riches. It is the people themselves that produce and transport their products and riches towards Europe and America and in exchange, they receive pieces of paper on which are inscribed numbers (money). And they believe they have accomplished an exchange that is acceptable. One does not need to point at the fact that the money made of paper brought in by the dominated nations has been allocated a value that is backed by the 80ld brought in by the same nations. In this particular case, it will be difficult for an observer to convince the colonized that he just exchanged his spices, diamonds, and all his national riches for a piece of paper that is backed by the same wealth he owned. The conquest of the mind and spirit is a gold mine for colonial forces.
The politician is conscious of the limited nature of his impact on the conquered people - that is, unless there exists on the side of his institution diverse institutions aiming at not only educating the colonized to accept the colonizer as his savior or at least creating a relationship of dependence between the colonized and the colonizer.
The first colonial weapon has always been religion; the religion arrived always to the colonized in a very condescending way with the goal first of separating the colonized from the spiritual sources of his existence. One must eliminate all the philosophical reasons for his attachment to his Gods. All this in the principle that reminds us of the Kemetic proverb saying "Just separate the chicks from their mother and then you can gather them." Keep the human being away from his Gods and Ancestors and he will be lost in space and time. He will then become the easy prey for his predator.
Maybe the most terrible weapon of colonialism is the principle by which the colonial force becomes the same one that educates the colonized. It always succeeds in placing itself in that position by eliminating in the colonized society the methods of transmitting knowledge from one generation to another. This situation then places the colonized in a position of latency, not giving him even the time to understand what is happening to him. The most shocking example can be seen in the people of color. The average person of color can accept that slavery is a barbaric act posed on him by Europeans and Arabs who all hate him, but he could not see that Christianity and Islam are in reality manifestations of the domination of these colonial forces on him. The colonizer understood that the slave needs his freedom and he took on the task of creating for people of color heroes in politics or the so-called spiritual field just to maintain a status quo in the battle of black people to liberate themselves from slavery. The reality is that those whom the black man of the modern society calls his heroes are in reality the servants of the colonial ideology. They have generally been educated and trained by the colonial schools or simply their reputation is being built based on their contributions to the same ideologies that have turned their people into slaves! The most visible example is one of the diverse pastors, reverends, and priests of the religions of slavery generally from the black Diaspora that the colonial system wants to force upon the black people to accept as their leaders and heroes. While already by their functions and professions, they are nothing other than traitors to their own culture and civilization. It will be a lot easier to unmask these men who are faithful servants of their colonial masters if, on the other side, the colonizer was not putting so much effort into educating the youth to accept the logic according to which it is possible to be a hero and a leader of one set of people while one is a servant of the other!
When your leader is a servant to a foreign group, he will turn you into animals. He is more interested in his social position in the foreigner's world than the destiny of his own people; as we say in my village, this type of person is just happy with their position as a chief or leader of their people despite the fact that they are seen as dogs by other people... the dog of the king ... is the king of the dogs. This is the insulting part to a community that has been colonized.
When one has been educated by the same person who has made you a slave, when one finds oneself worshipping a god of those who have tried and are still trying to destroy you, when one places their health in the hands of the same people that do not believe one has a right to exist, etc., it is clear that as a cultural or civilizational group, one is simply advancing towards final destruction.
All this is only possible because the colonizer has become the same one that is defining our values. The colonizer is the one who is training and educating those we are supposed to consider our leaders and heroes. These leaders can only lead us toward their masters! Christianity and Islam have been and are the fighting horses of slavery... Martin Luther King was a reverend! Malcolm X was a Muslim! Mulumba, Quame Nkruma, Cabral, Nelson Mandela, Seghor, etc., were all the products of European and American universities. In other words, they were not educated by their own people. They could only be the dolphins in the colonial hands. This is maybe why after the so-called independence they had preferred to keep the political power to themselves instead of returning it to our traditional kings and emperors!
We must have the courage to call things by their name; it is the colonial empire that is trying to hypnotize the colonized people to the point of fabricating heroes for them. Most of our so-called leaders became popular for gathering their people so that they could go whine and beg for others to assimilate them; how can we see in these actions a quest for self-determination for their people?
Since the Berlin conference mapped and created fictitious countries on the Kemetic continent (Africa), these fictitious countries have become territories on which every African who is "well-educated" by his master can in a very intrepid way deny the political power to their parents and forefathers, and at the same time, pretend they are leading the nation on the basis of legitimacy that has only been allocated to them by the colonial system!
The colonial school only builds traitors. Every time we come out of these schools, our intelligence is directed towards the glorification of our situation. We become masters in the art of fatalism. But in my village, we say that the one that has betrayed you yesterday will not save you today. This is why every entity and belief possesses a history. When it comes to the destiny of people, what has been horrible in the past can only become good today if that thing has succeeded in destroying our survival instinct.
The colonialism and slavery are continued simply because those who we call our leaders are charming us and encouraging us to see something good in our enslavement and dishonor. They are not with us; they are only the dogs of the king. They are only doing their job, which is to serve the master.
